Al-Qalam 
Help me understand this: Why is there this fixation over the assassination of Charlie Kirk in Utah, dubbed the red-neck part of the USA?
This guy is made out to be a hero. He was a pro Trumpeter-Vancer. Charlie Kirk was indeed a strong supporter of Israel and Zionism. He was licensed by Netanyahu. So why is he plugged as a hero-saint when, like his captains, he has blood plastered on his soul?
I have spent much time trying to fathom this person. The online media is doing a Goebbels justifying Naziism as part of the final solution. He consistently defended Israel’s genocidal actions and countered what he saw as anti-Israel narratives on US campuses. Kirk’s pro-Israel stance was evident in his social media posts. Go look him up before it’s too late.
*He Defended Israeli actions in Gaza: Kirk blamed Hamas for civilian casualties and compared the situation to World War II Japan, stating that Israel wasn’t starving Palestinians in Gaza, despite reports of blocked aid and violence against aid seekers.
*He spoke out against anti-Israel rhetoric: He actively challenged lies about Israel and stood with Jewish students facing hostility, earning him recognition from Israeli leaders like Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who called him a “friend of Israel” and “lion-hearted”.
The sheer toxicity underlying his persona is masked by a pro-Zionist captured media.
Those criminals who sacrificed him to appease the Gods of ignorance have won, but let the fruits of their victory become ashes in their mouths.
The alleged assassin of Charlie Kirk is a 22-year-old Tyler Robinson who is a male Caucasian – translated a white man. Try imagining if he happened to be Black or of Middle Eastern origin. By now we’d be flooded with plants alluding to his radicalisation and possible indoctrination-association by virtue of his skin colour and religious affinity with the maligned Muslim groups. Awkward questions and investigations need to be asked and conducted.
At 22 what led to his alleged radicalisation? His sniper skills? His arms training? If he was a black or of Middle Eastern origin, we would’ve been flooded with manufactured aka fabricated facts by now.
Did the media in their manufactured redemption of Charlie Kirk allude to like a Saul of Tarsus type experiencing a damascene moment and doing a 360⁰ turn against Zionism?
I don’t buy it, and neither should you.
Saber Jhazbhay
Attorney
Durban
