2 December 2024

By Imraan Buccus 

Over the years numerous credible commentators have argued that Julius Malema and the EFF are proto-fascist or fascist. The EFF is clearly an authoritarian formation in which corrupt and demagogic leaders back the most ruthlessly corrupt faction of the political elite while claiming to speak for the poor.

The EFF also makes regular racist statements about Indians, some of which have disturbing echoes with some of racist tropes about Jewish people found in European fascism. In a recent rant Malema railed against an “Indian cabal that is taking strategic positions in this country” at the expense of “Africans”.

No one in their right mind doubts that there is anti-African racism among some people of Indian descent. At the same time no one in their right mind doubts that, just as is the case with all other groups, there is a wide range of political positions held by people of Indian descent, including deep anti-racist commitments. It is also a matter of historical record that many Indian people committed their lives to the struggle against racism, some suffering torture and imprisonment, and some paying the ultimate price.

All the major progressive traditions in South Africa worked to build unity within the wider black population. This is true of the Black Consciousness Movement, the Communist Party, the trade union movement, the United Democratic Front and uMkhonto weSizwe. 

This tradition is not dead. The Durban based Abahlali baseMjondolo, the hundred thousand strong poor people’s movement that now organises across five provinces welcomes Indian members. One of its powerful women leaders in its early years was the courageous activist Shamitha Naidoo, who is of Indian descent.

However the ANC has a mixed record on this question. Its liberals, communists and trade unionists have always clearly opposed anti-Indian racism. But one can argue that there is a long-standing current of anti-Indian sentiment in the ANC, going back to Anton Lembede, the founding president of the ANC Youth League. That current which can be characterised as a chauvinist form of nationalism, is the political line from which Malema descends, via the late Peter Mokaba who was openly anti-Indian. 

Mokaba was also an AIDS denialist and, as the Harvard historian Jacob Dlamini writes, a known agent of the apartheid system. Open anti-Indian sentiment continued after Mokaba’s death with Fikile Mbalula, an intellectual and political mediocrity, being particularly notorious.

But the ways in which the party’s history is compromised on the questions of race runs deeper than its explicitly chauvinist current. For many years it mirrored Verwoerdian racial ideas by dividing its supporters into four congresses – the ANC for Africans, the South African Indian Congress for people of Indian descent, the Coloured Peoples’ Congress for people deAfricanised by the colonial state and the Congress of Democrats for whites. It was only the Communist Party, and later uMkhonto weSizwe, that worked outside of Verwoerdian racial categories.

Membership of the ANC was solely for people defined as Africans by the apartheid state until 1969 and people who would not have been classified as African by Verwoerd were only allowed to be elected into leadership after the 1985 Kabwe conference. The ANC’s commitment to non-racialism came very late, and was never uniform.

The fact that Malema makes outrageous anti-Indian statements is no surprise. Right wing demagogues have risen in much of the world and they always scapegoat and defame minorities of various kinds. What is disappointing is that the dominant factions in the ANC do not come out fighting against Malema’s scurrilous conduct. But, perhaps, given how recent and fragile the ANC’s commitment to genuine non-racialism is we should not be entirely surprised.

But when racial scapegoating and conspiracy theories become normalised we are on a dangerous path. Progressives across sectarian lines, and including both trade union federations as well as grassroots organisations and the Communist Party need to draw a line in the sand.

Dr Imraan Buccus is Al Qalam editor and academic director of a university study abroad program.  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.